<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vincent van Gogh: Sunflowers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artandcritique.com/16/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artandcritique.com/16/</link>
	<description>Critical articles on artists from various periods, including contemporary daily/frequent painters. Art interpretation guide.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://artandcritique.com/16/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artandcritique.com/2007/09/23/16/#comment-667</guid>
		<description>It's amazing how Van Gogh was so truly ahead of his time. It's probably why we're still talking about him today. I even read something on pandalous that suggests he may have been a precursor to all 20th century art. It's here: http://www.pandalous.com/nodes/van_gogh_as_a_precursor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing how Van Gogh was so truly ahead of his time. It&#8217;s probably why we&#8217;re still talking about him today. I even read something on pandalous that suggests he may have been a precursor to all 20th century art. It&#8217;s here: <a href="http://www.pandalous.com/nodes/van_gogh_as_a_precursor" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.pandalous.com');">http://www.pandalous.com/nodes/van_gogh_as_a_precursor</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
